Is man a wolf to man? What science says

by Jacques Lecomte | 24 Dec 2023 | Our experts in the media, Ethics, Collapse

Reading time is .

Key points

  • A belief, not knowledge: ‘man is a wolf to man’ comes from a play by Plautus, not from a study.
  • What science shows: a predisposition to mutual aid, visible from 14 months old in a majority of babies.
  • A disposition to cultivate: education, culture and personal choices make kindness grow or limit it.
  • A contagion effect: reciprocity and stories of kindness can tip a society towards greater cooperation.

🤝 Is man really a wolf to man?

In Paris Match Belgique, Jacques Lecomte, doctor of psychology and member of APALA’s expert committee, answers that this idea is a matter of belief, not science.

🔎 His thesis
Research over the last thirty years describes a species predisposed to altruism and cooperation. This disposition is not a guarantee: it has to be cultivated.

🧭 Three ideas
1. Science has changed its outlook: from 14 months old, a majority of babies spontaneously help a stranger in difficulty.
2. Kindness endures even in the worst circumstances: in the face of disasters, victims help one another rather than panic.
3. Kindness is pollinated: one generous gesture calls forth others, and stories of kindness make us want to act.

💬 Why we are sharing it
Transitions rest on cooperation. Believing that everyone thinks only of themselves leads to policies of mistrust; putting faith in trust, without naivety, opens up other possibilities.

👉 Our structured summary and the link to the original interview:

Is man really a wolf to man? 🤝

In Paris Match Belgique, Jacques Lecomte, a member of our expert committee, explains that science describes, on the contrary, a species predisposed to cooperation, and that kindness can be cultivated.

Our summary in three ideas, with the link to the original interview 👇

Is man really a wolf to man? 🤝

Jacques Lecomte, a member of APALA’s expert committee, answers in Paris Match Belgique.

His three ideas:
1️⃣ Science describes a species predisposed to mutual aid
2️⃣ Kindness endures even in the worst moments
3️⃣ Kindness is pollinated: one gesture calls forth others

Full summary and link to the interview: link in bio.

#APALA #thinktank #transitions #coopération #bonté #entraide #psychologiepositive #société #débat #ParisMatch

interview with Jacques Lecomte, Paris Match Belgique, 24 December 2023

The idea of a fundamentally selfish and violent human being is a matter of belief, not science. Research over the last thirty years describes a species predisposed to mutual aid, provided this disposition is cultivated.

In brief

  • ‘Man is a wolf to man’ is not a scientific finding, but a line spoken by a character of the playwright Plautus; Hobbes, Freud and Lorenz mostly expressed opinions.
  • This pessimistic view has consequences: it devalues cooperation, passes cynicism off as realism and produces self-fulfilling prophecies.
  • Kindness is not guaranteed; it is a soil: education, culture and our choices make it grow or limit it.

The three ideas of the interview

1. The sciences

A demonstrated predisposition

Neurobiology, psychology and anthropology converge: researchers at the Max Planck Institute observe spontaneous helping gestures in a majority of babies from 14 months old, and the brain’s reward areas respond to cooperation, not to competition.

2. History

Kindness endures even in the worst circumstances

In real disasters, victims help one another rather than panic. During the Second World War, according to a survey cited, 96% of the people asked to help Jews agreed.

3. Society

Kindness is pollinated

Reciprocity is a universal moral rule: receiving a generous gesture prompts us to return it. Stories of kindness lift us up and make us want to act; everyone can thus help tip society towards greater cooperation.

‘all of us, in our daily lives, can be pollinators of kindness’Jacques Lecomte, interview in Paris Match Belgique, 24 December 2023

Why this debate interests us

Ecological and social transitions rest on cooperation: between citizens, between public and private actors, between generations. If we believe that everyone thinks only of themselves, we design policies based on constraint and mistrust. This interview, backed by research, invites us to put more faith in trust, without naivety about violence or injustice.

Questions for debate

  1. Does our pessimistic view of human nature influence our political choices, for example in the face of the ecological emergency?
  2. How can schools, businesses and associations cultivate cooperation rather than competition?
  3. Should the media give more space to stories of kindness, at the risk of appearing naive?

To go further on apala.fr

Summary written by Claude (Opus 5.5 model), an artificial intelligence, for APALA, based on the interview published in Paris Match Belgique on 24 December 2023. The positions expressed are those of the interviewee. Spotted a mistake? Write to us.

Read the interview on Paris Match ↗

Guidance: what if AI governed us through good advice?

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier presents Antoine Buéno’s ‘Guidance’: the danger of AI would be less that it exterminates us than that it advises us too well. Our summary in three arguments.

Wildfires of summer 2026: what the global data say

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier compares the exceptional wildfires of summer 2026 in France with global satellite data, which describe a rather calm year. Our summary in three arguments.

Does organic farming keep its promises? Naturalness put to the test of the facts

In Atlantico, Thomas Lepeltier challenges the founding principle of organic farming, the preference for the natural over the synthetic, and judges its record to be more nuanced than its image. Our summary in three arguments.

A future without suffering? A video to open the debate

With The Flares, APALA offers a short foresight video: what if reducing avoidable suffering, among humans and other animals alike, were one of the great undertakings of the century?

Biodiversity: a public exchange with Tatiana Giraud

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier criticised the way Tatiana Giraud presents biodiversity; she replied, and he responded in turn. Our summary of the three texts: arguments, quotations and questions for debate.

Performance or robustness? Olivier Hamant’s thesis challenged

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier challenges the opposition between performance and robustness defended by the biologist Olivier Hamant: in his view, the resilience of societies comes from innovation and efficiency. Our summary in three arguments.

Natural or synthetic? What the ban on copper says about organic farming

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier draws a lesson from the withdrawal of copper-based fungicides decided by Anses: judge each product by its effects, not by whether it is natural or synthetic. Our summary in three arguments.

AI and extinction: Yudkowsky and Soares’s thesis in question

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier examines the thesis of Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares that a superintelligent AI would exterminate humanity. Our summary in three arguments.

Climate: why Bill Gates’s change of tone deserves to be welcomed

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier analyses Bill Gates’s change of tone on climate: not a repudiation of science, but a reminder that poverty and disease remain the greatest threats. Our summary in three arguments.

Sufficiency: a critique of Philippe Bihouix’s vision

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier responds to Philippe Bihouix: choosing sufficiency from today underestimates our capacity to innovate, and abundance would be the condition for sustainability. Our summary in three arguments.

0 comments

make a donation!

Public-interest association: €10 from you means nearly €30 for us, after tax relief.

Understand how it works