Energy, growth and decline: Jean-Marc Jancovici’s theses debated

by Thomas Lepeltier | 5 Sep 2025 | Our experts in the media, Resources, Progress

Reading time is .

Key points

  • The diagnosis we accept: the economy still depends massively on fossil fuels, and substituting for them is difficult.
  • Decoupling: several European countries are already growing while consuming less fossil fuel.
  • Thermodynamics: the Earth is not a closed system, and the second law sets no deadline for growth.
  • The conclusion: taking the energy challenge seriously does not oblige us to conclude that decline is inevitable.

⚡ Does the energy challenge condemn our economy to decline?

In two columns for Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier, director of APALA’s think tank, discusses the theses of Jean-Marc Jancovici, one of the most listened-to voices on energy and climate.

🔎 His thesis
The diagnosis of our dependence on fossil fuels deserves attention. But inevitable decline does not follow from it, and green growth is not physically impossible.

🧭 Three arguments
1. Several European countries already show absolute decoupling between growth and fossil fuel consumption.
2. The Earth is not a closed system: it receives energy from the Sun, and the second law says nothing about the timescale of any possible limit.
3. It is not a lack of resources that has held societies back, but ignorance; and knowledge has no known limit.

💬 Why we share it
APALA shares this analysis: taking the energy challenge seriously does not oblige us to give up on progress. A discussion of public positions, not of a person.

👉 Our structured summary and the link to the original columns:

Does the energy challenge condemn our economy to decline? ⚡

In two columns for Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier, director of our think tank, discusses the theses of Jean-Marc Jancovici: a useful diagnosis on energy, but no inevitable decline.

Our summary in three arguments, with links to the original columns 👇

Does the energy challenge condemn our economy to decline? ⚡

Thomas Lepeltier, director of APALA’s think tank, discusses the theses of Jean-Marc Jancovici in Causeur.

His three arguments:
1️⃣ Decoupling is already being observed
2️⃣ The Earth is not a closed system
3️⃣ Innovation remains the best response

Full summary and links to the columns: link in bio.

#APALA #thinktank #transitions #energy #climate #growth #innovation #debate #Causeur

by Thomas Lepeltier, Causeur, 5 September 2025

For Jean-Marc Jancovici, falling oil supply condemns the economy to contraction, and green growth is physically impossible. Both articles acknowledge the value of his diagnosis on energy, but dispute that inevitable decline follows from it.

In brief

  • What the author accepts: our civilisation still relies massively on fossil fuels, the energy available largely determines our standard of living, and substituting low-carbon sources is difficult.
  • What he disputes: a fixed relationship between energy and GDP, a ‘peak oil’ announced since the 1970s that has never occurred, and the idea that every material flow is a nuisance.
  • In the second text (‘Sky is not the limit’), he responds to the thermodynamic argument that green growth would be impossible.

The three arguments of the columns

1. The facts

Decoupling already observed

Several European countries show signs of absolute decoupling between growth and fossil fuel consumption, including imported emissions, thanks to energy efficiency, the shift to services and low-carbon energy.

2. The physics

The Earth is not a closed system

The second law of thermodynamics applies to a closed system; the Earth continuously receives energy from the Sun. And nothing in this law says how long it would take for any degradation to affect humanity.

3. The project

Sufficiency as a horizon

Capping flights, being wary of nuclear fusion or AI: for the author, these positions reflect a distrust of innovation, whereas it is ignorance, not a lack of resources, that has held societies back.

De 1990 à 2024, la richesse produite en France a augmenté de 67 %, tandis que ses émissions de CO₂ de consommation, importations comprises, baissaient de 18 % (−34 % pour les émissions territoriales). Même découplage au Royaume-Uni, en Suède et en Allemagne. Dans le monde, en revanche, le PIB a presque triplé et les émissions ont augmenté de 70 % : le découplage absolu n'y est pas encore observé.
‘By claiming to protect society against the illusions of progress, he locks it into the opposite illusion: that of an inevitable decline.’Thomas Lepeltier, Causeur, 5 September 2025

Why this debate interests us

The theses of Jean-Marc Jancovici shape a large part of the public debate on energy and climate. APALA shares Thomas Lepeltier’s analysis: taking the energy challenge seriously does not oblige us to conclude that decline is inevitable, and innovation remains our best response. The discussion here concerns public positions, defended in the media, and not the person.

Questions for debate

  1. Can decoupling between growth and fossil fuels become general?
  2. Does thermodynamics really set a limit to growth on a human scale?
  3. Should certain uses, such as flying, be rationed, or should we bet on decarbonising them?

To go further on apala.fr

Summary written by Claude (Opus 5.5 model), an artificial intelligence, for APALA, based on the two articles published in Causeur on 5 September 2025. The views expressed are those of the author. Spotted a mistake? Write to us.

Read the first article on Causeur ↗

Guidance: what if AI governed us through good advice?

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier presents Antoine Buéno’s ‘Guidance’: the danger of AI would be less that it exterminates us than that it advises us too well. Our summary in three arguments.

Wildfires of summer 2026: what the global data say

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier compares the exceptional wildfires of summer 2026 in France with global satellite data, which describe a rather calm year. Our summary in three arguments.

Does organic farming keep its promises? Naturalness put to the test of the facts

In Atlantico, Thomas Lepeltier challenges the founding principle of organic farming, the preference for the natural over the synthetic, and judges its record to be more nuanced than its image. Our summary in three arguments.

A future without suffering? A video to open the debate

With The Flares, APALA offers a short foresight video: what if reducing avoidable suffering, among humans and other animals alike, were one of the great undertakings of the century?

Biodiversity: a public exchange with Tatiana Giraud

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier criticised the way Tatiana Giraud presents biodiversity; she replied, and he responded in turn. Our summary of the three texts: arguments, quotations and questions for debate.

Performance or robustness? Olivier Hamant’s thesis challenged

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier challenges the opposition between performance and robustness defended by the biologist Olivier Hamant: in his view, the resilience of societies comes from innovation and efficiency. Our summary in three arguments.

Natural or synthetic? What the ban on copper says about organic farming

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier draws a lesson from the withdrawal of copper-based fungicides decided by Anses: judge each product by its effects, not by whether it is natural or synthetic. Our summary in three arguments.

AI and extinction: Yudkowsky and Soares’s thesis in question

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier examines the thesis of Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares that a superintelligent AI would exterminate humanity. Our summary in three arguments.

Climate: why Bill Gates’s change of tone deserves to be welcomed

In Causeur, Thomas Lepeltier analyses Bill Gates’s change of tone on climate: not a repudiation of science, but a reminder that poverty and disease remain the greatest threats. Our summary in three arguments.

Sufficiency: a critique of Philippe Bihouix’s vision

In Le Point, Thomas Lepeltier responds to Philippe Bihouix: choosing sufficiency from today underestimates our capacity to innovate, and abundance would be the condition for sustainability. Our summary in three arguments.

0 comments

make a donation!

Public-interest association: €10 from you means nearly €30 for us, after tax relief.

Understand how it works